Abiotic ressources

Paul Robineau (UTT), Tatiana REYES CARRILLO (UTT)

Projet ET-LIOS

CC 4.0 BY-NC-SA + licence commerciale ET-LIOS

Objectifs

Understanding the different stakes of abiotic resources.

Introduction

Définition« Abiotic ressources »

  • Firstly, biotic resources refers to ressources coming from living things, or more precisely, organic matter. Ex: animals, plants.

  • Consequently, abiotic resources refers to all ressources but biotic ones. So, it encompasses minerals, but also air, water, sunlight, etc.

  • Fossil fuels can be classified either as biotic or abiotic resources, depending on the timescale considered. Indeed they’re coming from living things, resulting of bio-geo- chemical cycles, but were definitvely formed milllion years ago. In EV14, we’ll consider them as abiotic.

But what even are « resources »? [1]

  • Surprisingly, it is not often explicitly defined, even in major texts. Ex: ISO 14040 norm (giving framework for all Life-cycle analysis), or the classical 1983 report of the United Nations.

  • Analysis of varied definitions highlights some converging points: a resource is considered as such if :

    • It has an value or utility (from material properties for an industrial process to cultural valorization of precious stones)

    • For a certain subject (generally considered: the humans)

General caracterizations

The renewable/non-renewable polarity [2]

  • Renewable when the stock reconstitutes itself at a « sufficiently quick rate ». Usual threshold: timespan of a human life.

  • Non-renewable when they constitute themselves on a long period of time, way longer than a human life. Their use is always a depletion in available stocks.

The availability/non-availabilitypolarity

  • Available when concentration and position let them be technically AND economically usable by humans.

  • More or less available according to the variation of these dimensions. Ex: Oil shale in the XXth, depending on stocks’ concentrations and competition with conventional crude oil. [4]and [5]

Consomption of abiotic resources

  • Main threads of the course : Metals and Oil

  • Metals

    • Brief global history

    • Contemporary trends

  • Oil :

    • Brief global history

    • Contemporary trends

  • Sociotechnical perspective (Tutorial work)

Main threads of the course

The mineral resource example: Metals

  • Why metals? On the 118 known atoms, most of them are metals :[3]

    • 85 metals

    • 6 metalloids

    • 17 non metals

    • 10 non determined

  • General properties :

    • electrical & thermal conductors

    • mechanical ductility

  • Geological forms: oxides (common) > sulfides (less common) > natives (uncommon)

The energetical resource example: Oil

  • Currently, most used source in main primary energy consomption :

    • Oil (33,1%)

    • Coal (27%)

    • Natural gas (24,2%) [6]

  • Regroup varied forms of derived fuels (petrol, shale oil) and secondary resources

  • General properties: gives a lot of secondary resources when refined, good energy density, easy and convenient to transport and to use as energy vector in varied contexts

Metals

Metals global history

A very brief summary [3]

  • Contrary to first intuition: native metals were the first to be used. Although uncommon (often mixed) they were ealily recognizable:

    • Copper (at least 8000 BC, and melted since 4000 BC), Gold and Silver (4000 BC)

    • Alloys starting in 2500 BC with Bronze (Tin & Copper)

    • Furnaces since at least 1000 BC let reduce oxides (notably, Iron oxide) and developp experiments on alloys (Steel = Iron + Carbon)

    • Lead, Antimony, Mercury used pure or in allows during Antiquity

  • This tiny number of metals has constituted the main uses until the XIXth century and structured economical and geopolitical relationships between populations

    • Besides native platinum in Peru, other metals like Nickel, Zinc, Cobalt have been identified by chemistry and metallurgy (beginning of XVIIIth). And then: Manganese, Molybdenum, Tungsten, Titanium (end of the XVIIIth).

    • Electrolysis in XIXth allows to separate most elements in pure form, but weak rate of use until the XXth century.

Contemporary trends

Continuous growth in use of base metals
  • Heterogeneous rise of world consumption for base metals: by a factor from 1,5 (Lead) to 3 (Alumunium)

  • Recycling rates not progressing as much

[7] ROGISH, D.G., and MATOS, G.R., 2008, The global flows of metals and minerals: USGS Open-File Report 2008–1355

Countries high disparities
Global Extraction/Consomption pattern

Figure 18. Consumption and extraction in the European Union group of 15 countries (EU-15). A, Base metals. B, Iron and steel.

Figure 20. Consumption and extraction in South America. A, Base metals. B, Iron and steel.

Growing variety of metals for expanding specific uses

Oil

Oil global history

A very brief summary [8]

  • Oil has been used for a long time in varied forms

    • Used as fuel as back as 400 BC in China

    • Used for lighting or in the asphalt form for construction as back as 2000 BC in Babylon

    • Crude oil already distilled by Persian chemist in 9th century to obtain tar, used for streets’ paving

    • Distillation arrive in Europe in 12th century through Islamic Spain

  • The mid19th –early20th turning point [9]

    • First industrial oil well and oil refinery around 1850

    • Consomption stayed low (5% of world energy in 1910), as oil as not that interesting at first, compared to wind or animals for transport, solar& coal were largely dominant for thermal power, etc.

    • Complex and crossing technical but mostly political phenomena let oil grew in varied uses, to represent more than60% of world energy as soon as 1970

[8] Petroleum, 2020. Wikipedia[online].

[9] BONNEUIL, C., FRESSOZ, J-B, 2016. The Shock of the Anthropocene. The Earth, History and Us.

Contemporary trends

No primary energy transition
  • Oil’s share in primary energy is steadily decreasing for more than30 years, but:

    • Oilisstillthe dominant energyvector

    • In absolute quantity, it is not declining at all, as for all energy vectors!

Extracted from [6]

Three main profiles
  • High ratio of Production/Consomption

  • Low ratio of Production/Consomption

  • Ratio of Production/Consomption near 1

Extracted from [6]

Consistency of uses

Extraction of abiotic resources

  • Reserves

    • Definitions

    • Metals focus

      • Concentrations

      • Mineralogical wall

    • Oil focus

      • Assessing reserves

      • Caution in interpretation

  • Impacts of extractive activities

    • Growing interdependancies

      • Energy footprint of minerals

      • Material footprint of energy

    • Environmental focus

      • Other abiotic resources: water & air quality

      • Biotic resources: wildlife and land

    • Socio-economical focus

      • Contrasted local realities

      • Global frictions…

      • Rootedin historical inequalities

Reserves

Définition

Adaptated from [3]

[3] BIHOUIX, P., GUILLEBON, B. ,2010. Quel futur pour les métaux?

[11] USGS, 2014. Estimate of Undiscovered Copper Resources of the World[online]. Fact Sheet.

[12] USGS, 2020. Mineral Commodity Summaries[online].

  • Reserves/Resources data are highly dynamic

    • May be reduced as

      • ore is mined

      • feasibility of extraction diminishes

    • May increase as

      • additionnal deposits are discovered

      • currently exploited deposits are thoroughly explored

  • The Copper example : [11] & [12]

    • Reserves/Resources≃500 Mt (2014) -> 870 Mt (2020)

    • InferredReserves≃2.1 Bt(2014)

    • UltimateReserves≃3.5 Bt(2014)

Metals focus

[3] BIHOUIX, P., GUILLEBON, B. ,2010. Quel futur pour les métaux?

Concentration of minerals

Extracted from [3]

  • Average concentrations of minerals in Earth crust must be compared to typical concentrations in exploited ores

  • Even for abondant elements, high ratio between economically viable concentrations and Earth crust average

    • Iron(Fe) example: 30-60 % in ores versus 5 % average in Earth crust

  • Precious metals are logically the only ones where the order of magnitude is equivalent

    • Typical example: Gold (Au)

  • If no major discoveries, historical tendancy is a decrease in average concentration causing an increase in cost and impacts :

    • Example of Copper (Cu): 1,8% (1930) -> 0,8% 2010

    • See opposite: (a) Concentration of varied ores in Australia(b) Concentration of Golde ores in the world

Extracted from [24]

[24] PRIOR, T et al., 2012. Resource depletion, peak minerals and the implications for sustainable resource management.

B. Mineralogical barrier

  • Abondant metals mining follows a simple curve :

    • Highest-grade ores are mined first, as they’re the most available ones–technically and economically

    • Like for any finite resources, mining depletes stocks, then target less high-grade ores, until a production peak happen, after what availability diminishes

Extracted from [13]

  • Scarce metals are usually not found in common rocks as separate minerals but as atoms substitutions (that’s makes them rare)

    • Consequently, mining activities directly seek concentrated ores (geologically rarer themselves), then must rely on more common ores, following a bimodal mining curve

Extracted from [13]

  • The shift to these more common rocks can be a turning point in processes needed, and generate a mineralogical barrier

[13] SKINNER, B.J., 1979. Chapter 10 A Second Iron Age Ahead? In: Studies in Environmental Science. [14] AYRES, Robert U, 2001. Resources, Scarcity, Growth and the Environment. . 2001. P.35.

Oil focus

Assessing reserves [15]

Extracted from [6]

[6] BP, 2020. BP Statistical Review of World Energy. [online].

[15] JANCOVICI, Jean-Marc, 2019. Les Energies fossiles. Ecole des Mines [online].

  • When a potential reserve of oil is suspected, sismography combined with exploratory drilling is used to estimate :

    • Quantities of oil

    • Probable recovery rate of the oil

  • As any oil extraction needs heavy infrastructure -> CAPEX>>OPEX.

    Which means the dynamics of a specific reserve are :

    • Strongly dependent on quantities& recovery rates estimations accuracy

    • Weakly dependent of variations in oil price (infrastructure already there)

  • Who evaluate & declare the reserves?

    • A lot of oil companies are state-owned. Around 10% of oil compagnies are listed on the stock exchange -> legally binded to communicate the estimations

    • Large part of data comes from countries but :

      • Geopolitical strategies due to production international agreements

      • Different conventions on what to count and in which category

      • No independent verifications

Caution in interpretation

Adapted from [15]

Impacts of extractive activities

Growing interdependancies

Energy footprint of minerals
  • A lot of operations involved

    • Extraction, mineral processing, metal working

    • 1st order transformation: smelting and refining

    • Transport between steps

    • This raw metal undergo varied 2nd order transformations to become raw products with diverging final energetical footprint

    • Copper example: tubes 20-30% higher footprint than foils

  • Uncertainties in data

    • Diversity of production sites (mineral concentration, efficiency of processes)

    • Varied studies perimeter (no standard approach, weigh of hypothesis)

    • Disparities in sources of information available

Extracted from [3]

  • Extraction & Refining of metals

    • Less & less concentrated mineral resources -> more & more energy

Extracted from [24]

[24] PRIOR, T et al., 2012. Resource depletion, peak minerals and the implications for sustainable resource management.

Material footprint of energy
  • Extraction & Refining of oil

    • ≃5% of world Steel use for gas/oil exploration & production

    • ‘Offshore’, ‘Depp offshore’, or

      Unconventionnal oil -> rise in the use of platforms, ships, complex tools, etc.

  • Even « Renewable energies » are quite materially dependent:

    • A 1MW windmill contains ≃ 3t of Cu, and needs 10x more steel & concrete per kWh than a classical plant

    • A classical PV installation (Si) needs ≃ 4kg of Cu per kW capacity.

    • Most these technologies also need rare metals like In, Ga, Se, Ne, etc.

Environmental focus

Other abiotic resources: water & air quality
Impacts on abiotic resources: water & air quality [16] & [17]

[16] ELAW, 2010. 1st Edition: Guide pour l’évaluationde EIE de projetsminiers [online].

[17] Hydraulic Fracturing 101. Earthworks [online].

[3] BIHOUIX, P., GUILLEBON, B. ,2010. Quel futur pour les métaux?

  • Acid drainage :

    • Most ores contains sulfure -> exposition to the surface through mining -> formation of sulfuric acid -> dissolves other metals and spills out in surrounding rivers or groundwater Ex: Summitville (1992-1995) [3]

  • Settling tanks

    • Containment of mining wastes -> infiltration into ground water or over flowsi n case of rain(one of the worst possible industrial accidents in terms of environmental impact) Ex: Aznacollar 1998 in Spain

  • Mines dewatering

    • Mining sometimes directly meet the groundwater table -> pursuit of mining need pumping of water -> reduction or elimination of water circulation in surrounding zones, varied degradations on soils and wildlife

      Ex: Sadiola Gold mine pumped 5,6 Mm3 of water in a year (≃ consommation of 800 000 Malians) [3]

  • Mobile or non-mobile sources of air pollutants

    • Fuel combustion & exhaust gases of machines or vehicules -> CO2, CO, organic compounds -> climate change

    • Waste particles dispersed by wind

    • Precious metals are often melted onsite before sent to rafineries -> high levels of Hg, As, SO2

  • Uncontrolled mercury (Hg) rejections

    • [Hg] in ores can rach 10 mg/kg -> 1 Mt of ores produced means 10t of Hg potentially emitted

    • Vaporization of Hg in gold metling is a major cause of Hg mission in atmosphere

Specifics to oil :

  • Hydraulic fracturing & Oil spills contaminations

  • Details in [17]

Biotic resources: wildlife and land

[16] ELAW, 2010. 1st Edition: Guide pour l’évaluationde EIE de projetsminiers [online].

[17] Hydraulic Fracturing 101. Earthworks [online].

  • Loss of habitat

    • Excavation or accumulation of waste -> mobile species (birds and some mammals)are hunted out + sedentary species (little mammals, reptiles, invertebrates) are killed

    • Acid drainage or dewatering -> severes impacts on surrounding aquatic life

    • These 2 points -> perturbation of trophic chains (diminution of food for the higher- level predators)

    • Disparition of vegetation

  • Fracture of habitat

    • Large portions of land occupied

      -> perturbation of migrations or local isolation of species

Specifics to oil (again):

  • Hydraulic fracturing & Oil spills contaminations

  • Details in [17]

Socio-economical focus

[16] ELAW, 2010. 1st Edition: Guide pour l’évaluationde EIE de projetsminiers [online].

[17] Hydraulic Fracturing 101. Earthworks [online].

[3] BIHOUIX, P., GUILLEBON, B. ,2010. Quel futur pour les métaux?

Contrasted local realities

[16] ELAW, 2010. 1st Edition: Guide pour l’évaluation de EIE de projets miniers [online].

[17] Hydraulic Fracturing 101. Earthworks [online].

[3] BIHOUIX, P., GUILLEBON, B. ,2010. Quel futur pour les métaux?

  • Human migrations

    • Displacement & reinstallation of communities (expropriated or not) -> resentment + power perturbations -> local conflicts

    • New high economic activity -> arrival of new populations -> new pressures on land, water or waste management -> tensions & potential conflicts with original inhabitants

      Ex of Grasberg Mines in Indonesia: From <1000 (1973) to 110 000 (1999) ; violent conflicts during 1970-1990

    • New needs of infrastructures -> urbanization -> wide-ranging effects

  • Loss of drinkable water access

    • Due to uncontrolled exploitations & industrial pollutions

  • Pressures on means of existence

    • Mining activities not correctly managed -> economic cost on other sectors (agriculture & fishing in particular)

  • Public health consequences

    • Potential sanitary risks are often seglected

      -> example of improvised mining towns are been shown to threaten food security and availability

    • Indirect effects of exposition to mining activities are higher incidences of tuberculosis, asthma, chronic bronchitis, etc.

    • A review of metals direct toxicity impacts can be found in a dedicated chapter of [3]

  • Cultural & Esthetics

    • Destruction of cultural resource by surface perturbation or excavation

    • To pographical or hydrological changes

    • Higher access to previously inacessible locations

      -> theft or vandalism of cultural artifacts

    • Visual impacts due to deforestation& presence of infrastructures

Global frictions...

[25] HUISMAN, J., PAVEL, C., et al. 2020. Critical Raw Materials in Technologies and Sectors -Foresight [online].

[3] BIHOUIX, P., GUILLEBON, B. ,2010. Quel futur pour les métaux?

  • Emerging geopolitical stakes for metals

    • As for oil, the main consumer countries are also the ones with the smallest reserves

    • Understanding of these problematics is more recent for metals and is parallel to the recent rise of metals prices in the 2000s

    • The EU Commission now regurlaly pubish reports on the matter[25]

    • Strategical stocks of metals constituted during Cold War, dismantled after the 90s, are back since15-20 years

  • Capitalistic concentration of compagnies :

    • in 2008, 4173 compagnies in mining but 149 majors (3,6%) were controlling 83% of the market[3]

    • Power to initiate struggles with states over natural resources and their exploitation, in order to maximize private profits and mutualize losses or environmental externalities

    • Complex conflicts with explicit and implicit actors

[3] BIHOUIX, P., GUILLEBON, B. ,2010. Quel futur pour les métaux?

  • Armed conflicts already existing

    • Not as visible as oil conflicts yet

    • DRC (Democratic Republic of the Congo) being the richer african country in metals, its history since mid-XXth is a paradigmatic example

  • Crossings with colonization & neocolonization

    • 1961 Defense agreements between France, Niger, Dahomey & Ivory Coast garantee limitation of exportations to other countries than France in case of needs

    • 2007 contract of China & RDC: heavy construction work (6 billions $) in in exchange of metal mining authorizations (10 Mt of Cu, 200 000 t of Co, 372 t of Au)

      • With explicit intention of asking land if the metal provisionning does not meet expectations

      • Direct implication in local economy

No need to developp on the well known history of oil geopolitical conflicts since mid-XXth!

Rooted in historical inequalities

[3] BIHOUIX, P., GUILLEBON, B. ,2010. Quel futur pour les métaux?

[18] RITCHIE, Hannah and ROSER, Max, 2017. CO₂ and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Our World in Data[online].

[19] BONNEUIL, C., FRESSOZ, J-B., 2016. L’événement anthropocène: la Terre, l’histoire et nous.

  • Developed countries did develop themselves on the exploitation of countries now productors & consumers

    • Between 1815-1880, 5/6 of British investments were outside their empire, chiefly to develop mining (coal, in particular) and transport of ores by rail in dominated countries [19] 

  • 20th century have mainly reorganized exploitation, but it continued on

    • USA based its economic rise on intensive use of its own resources during 1870-1940

    • Supported decolonization mainly to gain access to material resources of newly independant countries

    • Conversely, East block exploited its own environnment above all

  • Emerging trend ->

    • Reappropriations of national resources & path of developpmen

    • Setting of export restrictions [3]

Perspectives of abiotic resources

A matter of Stocks

The stocks’s stakes

Climate change – CO2 eq « stock »

[6] BP, 2020. BP Statistical Review of World Energy. [online].

[20] EIA, U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2016. Carbon Dioxide Emissions Coefficients. [online].

[21] IPCC. 2018. Mitigation Pathways Compatible with 1.5°C in the Context of Sustainable Development. . P. 82.

  • Oil emissions of current reserves

    • Proven reserves :

      -> 1733,9 billions barrels [6]

    • 53750,9 billion gallonsAverage on varied oil uses gives ≃ 10 kg CO2 emitted per gallon [20]

      -> 537,5 Gt CO2

  • World CO2 eq budget, current estimations : [21]

    • 1170 Gt CO2 eq to stay <2°C of global warming

    • 420 Gt CO2 eq to stay <1,5°C of global warming

  • Consomption of all current proven oil reserves is half of our total 2°C world budget and more than our total 1,5°C budget!

    • Without even considering natural gas, coal, or other emissions (CH4, for example) contributing to radiative forcing...

    • This considered, without changes, the 2°C threshold should be crossed in about 26 years

[3] BIHOUIX, P., GUILLEBON, B. ,2010. Quel futur pour les métaux?

[10] Data & Statistics,. IEA[online]. Available from : https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics

And mining is very dependent of highly carbonated, non renewable energy vectors

Adapted from [3] .The values for World averages of Electricity origin were replaced by updated data rom [10]

Production peak

[6] BP, 2020. BP Statistical Review of World Energy. [online].

[15] JANCOVICI, J-M, 2019. Les Energies fossiles. Ecole des Mines [online].

[22] World Energy Outlook 2018. IEA –International Energy Agency.

  • Hypothesis: we don’t mind CO2 eq emissions

    • Either we consider it’s not a problem

    • Or we think innovation or start-ups will solve that

    -> Exhaustion of Reserves through Production will still occur!

    • R/P ratio: most simplified model

    • Considering current reserves [6]

    • And 2019 rate of consomption [6] taken as constant for the years to come (quite unrealistic hypothesis of no flow reduction)

      -> No oil remaining in ≃ 50 years

[23] CALVO, G. et al.., 2017. Assessing maximum production peak and resource availability of non-fuel mineral resources.

[15] JANCOVICI, J-M, 2019. Les Energies fossiles. Ecole des Mines [online].

[22] World Energy Outlook 2018. IEA – International Energy Agency.

  • A slightly better estimate: the Hubbert peak model (1956)

    • We know there is no production at t = 0 and t = t final

    • The area below the production curve must be equal to the reserve

    • Regarding conventionnal oil, several countries seems to have peaked already. A review can be found here [15]

    • It is commonly believed that world production peak of conventionnal oil already happened, in 2008 [22]

Extracted from [23]

  • Reliability is influenced by several parameters

    • Uncertainty regarding reserves information

    • Particular environmental issues: health, water use, ore grade

    • Sociopolitical issues: new objects, changes of regulation, or armed conflicts

    • Interdependencies of byproducts

    • Substitution & recycling

  • That said, influence of reserves’ variation is limited when rapported to the current trends in production and growth of production

    -> Li case study: estimated reserves x 8 only delayed the peak by 46 years

Extracted from [23]

  • This recent try of systematic assessment is quite interesting to read[23] and accessible!

    • The time scaling is quite short, even for base metals

Extracted from [23]

  • Expected peak in the next 50 years : 12 metals over 47 studied: As, Bi, In, Li, Mn, Mo, Ni, Ag, Ta, Te, Zn

  • 30 metals over 47 have their expected peak in the next 100 years

  • Gold & Antimony peaked arround 2015 (agreement for Gold with [3])

Extracted from [23]

  • Taking into account the interdependencies of metals

    • Bold indicates it is the main production process of said metal

Extracted from [3]

[3] BIHOUIX, P., GUILLEBON, B. 2010. Quel futur pour les métaux?

  • Nearly a half of metals today exploited are interlinked

Extracted from [3]

Criticality

[26] GRAEDEL, T. et al., 2015. Criticality of metals and metalloids. DOI 10.1073/pnas.1500415112.

  • Notion related to the attempt to assess the relative risks concerning the availability of resources

    • Relatively recent preoccupation

    • As availability is an already complex notion, its risk analysis is also complex

      • Geological abondance & concentrations

      • Potential for substitution

      • State of the art of mining technology

      • Amount of regulatory oversight

      • Geopolitical initiatives

      • Governmental instability

      • Economic policy

    • As reserves are part of the assessment, it is also dynamic

  • Several methodologies

    • At different scales of organizations

    • For different scales of time

    • With then varied results difficult to compare between each other

Extracted from [26]

  • Criticality space: a first step is to get an overall idea

    • A number of metals are concentrated on the middle: moderately high on at least 2 axis (rare earths, Cr, Te, etc.)

    • Some are regrouped toward lower left: relatively low criticality (Fe, Mg, Ni, Mn, etc.)

    • The right side: high supply risk (In, Ag, Tl, As, Sb)

    • The particular case of Au & Pt

Extracted from [23]

  • This methodology allow the comparison of varid elements for (here at global level) :

    1. Supply risk

    2. Environmental implications

    3. Vulnerability to supply restriction

  • Keep in mind it is a relative assessment

    • Per kg comparison

  • Results may be underestimated

    • Database of 2008 (they were in the process ofupdating up to 2012 at publication in 2015)

    • As data revisions are not frequent & major technology changes occurs slowly, they recommand reassessment on a 5 years basis

Extracted from [23]

[25] HUISMAN, J., PAVEL, C., et al. 2020. Critical Raw Materials in Technologies and Sectors - Foresight [online].

Preserving stocks

Necessity & Limits of Recycling

[3] BIHOUIX, P., GUILLEBON, B. 2010. Quel futur pour les métaux?

  • Major difference between oil (energy resources) and metals (mineral ressources) :

    • Oil, Coal & Natural Gas -> mostly burned -> The flow is not retrievable

    • Metals -> mostly materially conserved -> The flow is retrievable + there is a stock in circulation!

  • Each year, stocks of metals :

    • Increases of the producted quantity

    • Decreases of the lost quantity

      • Dispersive uses (metals used as dyes or fertilizers)

      • No recycling (incineration or landfill disposal)

  • Current recycling

    • Precious metals (Au) or with moderately high value (Cu): few losses

    • Less noble metals (Al, Zn) have more important loss rates

    • No data for a lot of metals used in specific applications (electronics...)

  • Metals are one of the most interesting category of materials for recycling

    • Theoretically recyclable an infinite amount of time without diminishing their properties

    • Have high yield for stock preservation

      • 40% recycling rate -> 80% recycling rate <-> Reserves x 3

      • 50% recycling rate -> 99,9% recycling rate <-> Reserves x 500

  • Rich countries show that recycling rate can reach high levels for base metals

    • France (2010): 85% for Fe ; 80% for Al & Cu ; 70% Pb ; 50% Zn [3]

  • But it cannot do everything

    • No industrial process have a 100% efficiency -> same for recycling (remelt Al generate a dispersed loss of 1-2%)

    • A lot of our uses are not compatible with recycling

  • The trend of higher complexity

    • > 30 metals in a computer

    • > 10 alloys of Steel in a car

    • Prevent us from retrieving the resources: not easy and sometimes techically impossible to detect or separate metals of an allow

  • This phenomena exist for a lot of our metarials

    • Glass: mix of transparent & colored glasses -> no more use in most of construction or cars, only bottles

    • Plastic: often reused in less demanding uses (technically or aestetically)

-> Important to rethink life-cycles of products, raw materials, and mostly uses

  • -> Integrate less performant or pretty materials & more recycled materials

  • -> Organize recovery channels to boost recycling rate

  • -> But also question the trend of high tech solutions instead of low tech ones

  • -> That is, question the needs

  • The trend of direct dispersive uses

    • Dyes (98% of Ti used as TiO2 for white dyes)

    • Fertilizers (P, Zn, etc.)

    • Additives (Cr in Glass)

    • Pesticides (CuSO4 in some organic farming plants)

  • And « indirecty » dispersive uses (very difficult to recover)

    • 33% of Sn is used in welding

    • 50% of Zn is used in galvanizing

  • Some metals like Co or Mb are nearly exclusively used in dispersive uses or alloys

  • The socioeconomic limits

    • Economical incentives to constructors are not present or sufficient

    • Lack of reglementation and means to enforce it

    • Complexity of products and recovery channels does not help

Substitution
  • Limit the use in rare or noble metals in favor of abondant metals

    • Critical lens on « innovation »

    • Aim to maximize a low tech approach as much as possible at the level of product and technology

    -> For inorganic solar pannels, Si should be prefered to GaAs, CIGS, and others, even if the conversion efficiency is less important

  • For critical cases, possibilities needs to be carefully explored :

    • Cr nearly indispensible for anti-corrosion

      -> Ti can replace Cr in certain cases but its energy footprint is 4-5 times higher

    • Cu nearly indispensible for electrical applications

      -> Al can replace Cu in certain cases but its energy footprint is 2-3 times higher

  • Substituate oil by electrification? [27]

    • Li-ion batteries represented 37% of Li consumption in 2016 (and 40% of Co)

    • Batteries for electric vehicules were only 10% of Li-ion consumption in 2018

    • Most elements at disposal indicates that strong choices of resources’s uses will have to be made in the years to come :

[27] Responsible minerals sourcing for renewable energy, 2019. University of Technology Sydney [online].

[28] ABDALLA, A. et al., 2018. Hydrogen production, storage, transportation and key challenges with applications: A review. DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.03.088

[29] SCHMIDT, O., et al., 2017. Future cost and performance of water electrolysis: An expert elicitation study. DOI 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.10.045

  • Substituate oil by « hydrogen »?

    • Currently > 90% of H2 is produced by steam reforming (10 kg CO2 per kg of H2 produced) [28]

    • Water electrolysis / fuel cells have problems of their own [29]

      • Alkaline electrolysis is not adapted for electric cars

      • New technologies currently depends either on Pt and are not industrially mature (PEM) or rare earths and are at the state of demonstrators (SO)

  • In need of a big & new infrastructure for supply of cars

-> We are back to the vicious circle of energy & material footprint

Challenging needs

[30] BIHOUIX, Philippe, 2014. L’Age des low techs : vers une civilisation techniquement soutenable. Seuil.

  • The often most efficient stategy to preserve abiotic resources stock

    • House thermally isolated + put on a sweater >>> room heating technical solution

    • Most transport on bicycle (short distance) + train (long distance) with minimal use of a car (occasional rental) >>> electric cars replacing current diesel and petrol cars

    • Simple dismountable and repairable electronics >>> computer assembly with glue with digital prints technology

  • It is the first of the 7 principles of low-techs [30]

    1. Challenging needs

    2. Design and produce truly sustainable

    3. Orienting knowledge to resources’ savings

    4. Striking a technical balance between performance & conviviality

    5. Relocalize without losing the right scale effects

    6. De-machinizing services

    7. Knowing to remain modest

  • Indeed this kind of transition imply numerous socioeconomical consequences

    • As any kind of transition, it is also a matter of flows and their evolution

A matter of Flow

The flows’s stakes

Climate change

[31] IPCC. 2014: mitigation of climate change: Working Group III contribution to the 5th Assessment Report of the IPCC.

  • Trajectories mitigating climate change all require a global limitation of material & energy flows

    • Even with the hypothesis of a high developpment of the use of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies

[32] HCC, 2020. Maîtriser l’empreinte carbone de la France. Haut Conseil pour le Climat [online].

  • The French carbon footprint

    • A large part of our carbon footprint comes from importations

  • The French situation

    • Mineral resources: metals & cement

    • Energy resources & chemical products: oil

    • Abiotic resources are a large part of it, metals in particular!

    • In terms of weight of abiotic resources in domestic emissions: oil is dominant through transport (direct emissions), followed by metals & cement (indirect and distributed emissions)

  • High mitigation potential in transport <-> Combination of varied measures [31]

    • Low-carbon fuels -> higher flows of metals & lower flow of oil

    • Lowering vehicules energy intensities -> lower flows of oil & metals

    • Encouraging modal shift to lower-carbon passenger & freight systems

      -> lower flows of oil + short-to-medium term higher flows of metals for infrastructure investments

    • Avoid journeys where possible -> lower flows of oils

  • This kind of configuration apply generally

    • Specific augmentations in flows of metal are required to lower oil flows

    • Competition between uses requiring metals -> priorities will need to be established

Economics interdependancies

[15] JANCOVICI, Jean-Marc, 2019. Les Energies fossiles. Ecole des Mines [online].

[34] HABERL, H., et al, 2020. A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II : synthesizing the insights. DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a.

[33] HCC, 2020. Rapport annuel - Redresser le cap, relancer la transition. Haut Conseil pour le Climat [online]. 2020.

  • At world scale, there is a historical link between primary energy & material consumption, and economic production (as measured by GDP) [15] & [34]

    • There is no consensus on the exact nature of the relationship nowadays [33]

    • But we know that energy & material availability enables GDP growth

    • And GDP growth, by anticipation of economic growth causes energy & material use

  • A lot of ambitious climate target rely on the concept of « decoupling » [34]

    • Promotion of economic growth while reducing material & energy footprint (EMF)

    • When theorized as absolute -> EMF reduction & GDP growth

    • When theorized as relative -> EMF slow growth & GDP high growth

  • Recent systematic review clarifies that :

    • Relative decoupling is frequent for material use, GHG emissions, but not exergy

    • Relative decoupling of GDP and primary energy use can be caused by energy efficiency (higher ratio of exergy / primary energy use)

    • Absolute decoupling situations are very rare and are related to small short-term reductions of emissions

    • No evidence that absolute decoupling can be generalized

  • Degrowth/Sufficiency currently seems indispensible to meet climate target and sustainable use of abiotic resources:

    • Require a contraction of current economics functionning

    • And even fundamental changes in its functionning too

    • A byproduct of this scientific inquiries is that GDP is more & more considered as an irrelevant indicator for these problematics

Volatility of prices

[35] ECORYS, 2012. Mapping resource prices: the past & the future [online]. Final report to European Comission.

  • Base metals’ prices are historically quite constant relatively to each others but individual resource’s price is highly volatile [35]

[6] BP, 2020. BP Statistical Review of World Energy. [online].

  • Oil’s price is highly volatile too[6]

  • Resources’s prices underlying determinations

    • Percieved availability through control of producers

    • Degree of substitutability

  • Resources’s prices mecanisms of formations

    • Over-the-counter (OTC) markets: traditionnal mecanism

    • Annual or multi-year supply contracts: mainly, Fe and Fe allows

    • Pricing on forward markets

    • Special case of precious metals: considered as quasi-money or OTC.

  • Historically, numerous resources exchanges were operated by intermediates

    • Contemporary period: developpment of financialization

    • Alignment of Raw materials on securities -> far less intermediaries

    • Developpment of financial product derivatives + capitalistic concentrations of producers

      -> overvalued prices and speculations

[36] MITTEAU, Gilles, 2018. Economie et finance du pétrole - Heu?reka. [online].

  • Financial markets’s specific effects

    • Efficiency of market -> Trends of prices themselves tend to diseapear

    • Short-term interest of traders -> Short-term volatility

    • Complexity of the product and implications of prices variations on the economy

      -> Long-term volatility + impossibility to know for sure the causes of prices variations

    -> There is no « natural price-signalling » mecanism that makes a non- renewable resource progressively more expensive overtime

    -> The « natural » functionning of Financial markets seems to impply that the reduction of energy & material flows lead to higher volatility, or maybe higher « volatility of volatility »

For detailed reasonning, strong recommendation of Youtuber Heu?reka on Economy & Finance of oil

Contracting flows

Limits of efficiency
  • Like recycling, energy efficiency is necessary

    • Allow to reduce flows for a given performance

    • 25% energy yield -> 30% energy yield -> 1/6 of oil flows spared per year

    • 25% energy yield -> 50% energy yield -> 1/2 of oil flows spared per year

    • Same goes for « material efficiency » (diminshing the quantity of material needed to achieve a given functionnality)

  • But it is not sufficient, and could even be harmful on the global scale

    • Energy efficiency, when only measure applied, have mainly cost reduction effects

    • Cost reduction could then lead to democratize preexisting uses or create new ones

    • This then would lead to an overall increase in energy consumption

[37] SORRELL, Steve, 2007. The Rebound Effect: an assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency. [online]. UKERC

  • This would be called a « rebound effect » [37]

    • The « economy-wide » rebound effect is of combination of direct and indirect rebound effects that can interact with each other

  • Some basic examples of direct rebound effect :

    • If fuel-efficient vehicules make travel cheaper -> Consumers may choose to drive further / more often -> Offsets the energy savings

    • If a factory uses energy more efficiently -> Becomes more profitable -> May generate further investments -> More production

  • Some basic examples of indirect rebound effect :

    • Drivers of fuel-efficient cars may spend the money saved bying petrol on other energy intensive goods or services (ex: overseas flight)

[38] JEVONS, William Stanley, 1865. The Coal Question. . 1865. P. 213.

  • Rebound effect concept coms back to the XIXth century

    • Firstly known as « Jevons paradox » from W. J. Jevons [38]

    • Steam-engines’ efficiency had been increased by 10-fold at least in a century

    • Consumption of coal had greatly increased anyway (x 6 in 50 years)

  • The same considerations could be made about today :

    • Energy efficiency of cars’ engines have never been better

    • Our oil cosumption dedicated to it have never been higher

    -> Could be explained by:

    • The growth of car use driven by low cost of oil

    • And spared cost of cars invested in high-tech supplementary functions which increase car’s weight and maintain oil consumption

    • The increase in heavy vehicules like SUVs

[39] STERN, David I., 2017. How accurate are energy intensity projections?. DOI 10.1007/s10584-017-2003-3.

  • Quantified contemporary estimations are complicated :

    • There is indeed a correlation between various measures of energy efficiency and continuing growth of overall energy consumption

    • But the causal links between these trends are not clear

    • Difficulty to assess other things than direct rebound effects

  • That being said, evidence suggest that : [37]

    • It has the potential to widely vary between technologies, sectors, income groups

    • In OECD countries, automotive transport, household heating & cooling can relatively robustly be considered subjects to a direct rebound effect of 10-30% (microscale)

    • Current energy or material efficiency policies are not up to the task (macroscale)

  • Predictions of energy footprint decline itself are generally too optimistic [39]

Physics inevitability

[40] HALL, Charles A. S., et al., 2014. EROI of different fuels and the implications for society. DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.049.

  • Material & Energy flows will decline anyway due to the physics underlying the production peak

    • We’ve seen that the decline in ores’s grade do lead to an exponential demand in energy for base metals extraction, and that a mineralogical barrier can happen for rarer metals

    • But oil itself needs energy to be extracted!

  • Last notion of this course : EROI – Energy return on investment

    • Ratio of energy delivered by a specific energy vector and the energy invested in the capture & delivery of this energy

    • Measures the relative quality of energy vectors

  • Varied possible choices of boundaries in systemic assessments, so as much EROI calculations: standard ; point of use ; extended ; societal

    • Estimates re complicated due to oil compagnies low level of transparency

  • As oil is often extracted together with natural gas, calculations can be tricky

    • But all estimates tend to show a progressive decrease in EROI for every place where data is available : here in USA

  • Is there a trend for oil already?

    • It seems so

    • All estimates tend to show a progressive decrease in EROI for every place where data is available : here in USA

  • Is there a trend for oil already?

    • Pretty much so!

    • All estimates tend to show a progressive decrease in EROI for every place where data is available : here in Canada

  • Is there a trend for oil already?

    • Undeniably so!

    • All estimates tend to show a progressive decrease in EROI for every place where data is available : here in various other countries

  • It is logical from what we’ve seen about the concentration of resources in general. But why does it especially matter here?

    • The decrease of the EROI of conventionnal oil means we’ll need to set aside a growing share of the oil flows just to continue to have a flow

    • This share of oil « lost » will no longer be used to supply other sectors [36]

    • Non conventionnal oils have a base EROI quite lower than conventionnal (and will also decrease with their further exploitation) [40]

Managing consequences, tackling causes

[36] MITTEAU, Gilles, 2018. Economie et finance du pétrole -Heu?reka. [online].

[40] HALL, Charles A. S., et al., 2014. EROI of different fuels and the implications for society. DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.049.

[33] HCC, 2020. Rapport annuel -Redresser le cap, relancer la transition. Haut Conseil pour le Climat [online]. 2020. 

  • As there is no absolute decoupling, a contraction & instability of economy and as we know it seems unavoidable in the medium-term, regardless of climate change [36] & [40]

    • By « economy », here, we mean that all socioeconomical & geopolitical relationships will be impacted

    • Social acceptability of dynamics created by contracting flows will be a key component of the success ofmitigating policies [33]

    -> Ecological transition is also a social one

  • This is were we, as engineers & citizens, have apart to play

  • We would gain a lot to take inspiration from the 7 principles of low-techs [30]

    1. Challenging needs

    2. Design and produce truly sustainable

    3. Orienting knowledge to resources’ savings

    4. Striking a technical balance between performance & conviviality

    5. Relocalize without losing the right scale effects

    6. De-machinizing services

    7. Knowing to remain modest

[30] BIHOUIX, Philippe, 2014. L’Age des low techs : vers une civilisation techniquement soutenable. Seuil.

Bibliography

[1] BEYLOT, Antoine, ARDENTE, Fulvio, SALA, Serenella and ZAMPORI, Luca, 2020. Accounting for the dissipation of abiotic resources in LCA: Status, key challenges and potential way forward. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 1 June 2020. Vol. 157, p. 104748. DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104748.

[2] Resource, 2020. Wikipedia [online]. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Resource&oldid=982763984

[3] BIHOUIX, Philippe, GUILLEBON, Benoît de and CENTRE NATIONAL DU LIVRE (FRANCE), 2010. Quel futur pour les métaux? raréfaction des métaux: un nouveau défi pour la société. Les Ulis, France: EDP sciences. ISBN 978-2-7598-0713-0.

[4] History of the oil shale industry, 2020. Wikipedia [online]. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_the_oil_shale_industry&oldid=966512236

[5] ALIX, Pierre, BURNHAM, Alan, FOWLER, Tom, KLEINBERG, Michael and SYMINGTON, Bill, 2010. Coaxing Oil from Shale. Oilfield Review [online]. 2011 2010. Vol. 22, no. 4. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20150106093639/http://www.slb.com/~/media/Files/resources/oilfield_review/ors10/win10/coaxing.ashx

[6] BP, 2020. BP Statistical Review of World Energy. [online]. 2020. No. 69. Available from: https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2020-full-report.pdf

[8] Petroleum, 2020. Wikipedia [online]. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Petroleum&oldid=985135121

[9] BONNEUIL, Christophe and FRESSOZ, Jean-Baptiste, 2016. L’événement anthropocène: la Terre, l’histoire et nous. Nouvelle éd. révisée et augmentée. Paris: Éditions Points. ISBN 978-2-7578-5959-9.

[10] Data & Statistics. IEA [online]. Available from: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics

[11] USGS, 2014. Estimate of Undiscovered Copper Resources of the World [online]. Fact Sheet. Fact Sheet. Available from: https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2014/3004/pdf/fs2014-3004.pdf

[12] USGS, 2020. Mineral Commodity Summaries [online]. Available from: https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2020/mcs2020.pdf

[13] SKINNER, B.J., 1979. Chapter 10 A Second Iron Age Ahead? In: Studies in Environmental Science [online]. Elsevier. p. 559–575. ISBN 978-0-444-41745-9. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0166111608710719

[14] AYRES, Robert U, 2001. Resources, Scarcity, Growth and the Environment. . 2001. P. 35.

[15] JANCOVICI, Jean-Marc, 2019. Les Energies fossiles. Ecole des Mines [online]. 2019. Available from: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1fqoACrCFtlXKonP266DkFUcmMVj22yj_

[16] ELAW, Environmental Law Alliance Worldwilde, 2010. 1st Edition: Guide pour l’évaluation de EIE de projets miniers [online]. Available from: https://www.elaw.org/files/mining-eia-guidebook/Chapitre%201.pdf

[17] Hydraulic Fracturing 101, [no date]. Earthworks [online]. Available from: https://www.earthworks.org/issues/hydraulic_fracturing_101/

[18] RITCHIE, Hannah and ROSER, Max, 2017. CO₂ and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Our World in Data [online]. 11 May 2017. Available from: https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-other-greenhouse-gas-emissions

[19] BONNEUIL, Christophe and FRESSOZ, Jean-Baptiste, 2016. L’événement anthropocène: la Terre, l’histoire et nous. Nouvelle éd. révisée et augmentée. Paris: Éditions Points. ISBN 978-2-7578-5959-9. [Same that [9], little mistake on my part here)

Liste des raccourcis clavier

Liste des fonctions de navigation et leurs raccourcis clavier correspondant :

  • Bloc Suivant : flèche droite, flèche bas, barre espace, page suivante, touche N
  • Bloc Précédent : flèche gauche, flèche haut, retour arrière, page précédente, touche P
  • Diapositive Suivante : touche T
  • Diapositive Précédente : touche S
  • Retour accueil : touche Début
  • Menu : touche M
  • Revenir à l'accueil : touche H
  • Fermer zoom : touche Échap.